Leadership Scenarios

Principal-Level Leadership Questions

Overview

Leadership scenarios test your ability to lead teams, influence without authority, handle conflicts, and make decisions under uncertainty. At the Principal level, you’re expected to demonstrate strategic thinking, people leadership, and the ability to drive organizational change.

Leadership Framework

Scenario 1: Technical Disagreement

Question: “You disagree with a senior principal’s architecture decision. How do you handle it?”

Framework:

Understand first: Ask questions to understand their reasoning
Validate assumptions: Ensure you’re not missing context
Present data: Bring objective data, not opinions
Propose alternatives: “Have you considered X?”
Disagree and commit: If decision doesn’t change, support it
Escalate sparingly: Only if critical impact (security, legal, major cost)

Red flags:

Arguing in public meetings
Taking disagreement personally
Undermining decision after made
No data to support position

Green flags:

Curiosity about their reasoning
Bringing data and benchmarks
Proposing alternatives, not just criticizing
Supporting decision once made

Scenario 2: Underperformance

Question: “A senior engineer on your team is underperforming. How do you handle it?”

Framework:

Document specifics: Examples, dates, impact
Private conversation: Direct, empathetic, specific
Understand root cause: Skill, motivation, personal
Create improvement plan: SMART goals, support, timeline
Regular check-ins: Weekly feedback, adjust plan
Document everything: For PIP if needed

Conversation Script:

"I've noticed [specific examples] over the past [timeframe].
This is impacting [team/Project]. I want to understand
what's going on and how I can support you.

What's your perspective on this?"

Red flags:

Public criticism
Waiting too long to address
No documentation
Surprise PIP

Green flags:

Early, direct feedback
Coaching before PIP
Documented support
Clear expectations

Scenario 3: No Resources

Question: “You have a critical project but no headcount. How do you deliver?”

Framework:

Ruthless prioritization: What’s critical vs. nice-to-have?
Scope negotiation: Can we do less? Later? Differently?
Leverage contractors: Short-term boost for specific work
Automate: Invest in automation to multiply impact
Cross-team collaboration: Borrow resources, return favor
Phased delivery: Ship value incrementally

Escalation Template:

"I have a critical project (X) with business impact ($Y) but
no resources. I've prioritized to minimum viable scope, but
still need Z engineers.

Options:
1. Defer project (impact: $Y/month delayed)
2. Add 2 contractors (cost: $A, timeline: B)
3. Reprioritize other projects (risk: C)

Recommendation: Option 2. Your call?"

Scenario 4: Competing Priorities

Question: “Product and Sales have conflicting priorities. How do you resolve?”

Framework:

Facilitate discussion: Get both sides in room
Quantify impact: Revenue, customers, strategic value
Apply framework: Objective decision criteria
Recommend with data: “Based on X, recommend Y”
Document decision: Why we chose this path
Communicate rationale: Transparent to all stakeholders

Prioritization Frameworks:

Framework	How It Works	When to Use
RICE	Reach × Impact × Confidence / Effort	Product features
Value vs. Effort	Quadrant plotting	Roadmap planning
WSJF	Cost of Delay / Job Size	SAFe/Agile
Kano	Basic vs. delighters	Customer research

Scenario 5: Technical Debt

Question: “Your team has accumulated significant technical debt but is under pressure to ship features. How do you balance?”

Framework:

Quantify debt: Measure impact (slow builds, bugs, velocity)
Show business impact: “This debt is costing us X features/quarter”
Propose ratio: 20% debt paydown, 80% features (negotiable)
Track progress: Show velocity improvement over time
High-impact debt: Focus on high-ROI items first
Prevent new debt: Review processes, code reviews, architecture

Communication Template:

"Current technical debt is slowing us by ~30%. If we invest
20% of time paying down debt, we'll ship 50% more features
next quarter.

High-impact items:
- Migrate from X to Y (save 10 hours/week)
- Refactor Z (reduce bugs by 40%)
- Upgrade A (unblock feature work)

Recommendation: 20% debt paydown for 2 quarters."

Scenario 6: Team Morale

Question: “Your team is burned out after a crunch period. Morale is low. How do you recover?”

Framework:

Immediate Actions (Week 1):

Mandatory time off (no email/Slack)
Team appreciation (lunch, outing, bonus)
Cancel non-essential meetings
Acknowledge sacrifice publicly

Medium Actions (Month 1):

Retro on what went wrong
Process changes to prevent recurrence
Hire contractors/perm to reduce load
Cancel or defer low-priority work

Long-term Prevention:

Sustainable pace (no regular crunch)
On-call rotation improvements
Proper planning and estimation
Hire to headcount needs

Red flags:

Ignoring burnout signs
“That’s just how it is”
No process changes after crunch
Blaming team for not “keeping up”

Scenario 7: Hiring Freeze

Question: “You have headcount approved but a hiring freeze is announced. How do you handle the team?”

Framework:

Assess current commitments: What’s realistic?
Communicate early: Don’t wait to be asked
Renegotiate scope: Defer or cancel low-priority work
Support team: Recognize extra effort, prevent burnout
Plan for future: Job descriptions ready for when freeze lifts
Leverage contractors: If budget allows

Communication Template:

"Due to hiring freeze, we can't add engineers this quarter.
Current commitments:
- Must-do: X, Y (feasible with current team)
- Nice-to-do: Z, W (need to defer)

Team impact:
- Current team will need to cover X
- Recognizing this with spot bonuses
- No new commitments until freeze lifted"

Working on reopening headcount next quarter.

Scenario 8: Resistance to Change

Question: “You’re introducing a major technical change, but the team is resistant. How do you handle it?”

Framework:

Listen first: 1:1s to understand concerns
Acknowledge validity: “You’re right to be concerned about X”
Co-create solution: Involve resistors in design
Find champions: Early adopters to advocate
Pilot with volunteers: Proof of concept
Show wins: Quick, visible improvements
Make opt-in: Don’t force, let results convince

Red flags:

Forcing change without buy-in
Dismissing concerns
Not addressing real risks
“Because I said so”

Green flags:

Listening sessions
Co-design workshops
Pilot programs
Celebrating early adopters

Leadership Principles

Principal-Level Leadership

Key Principles

Principle	Description	Example
Influence without authority	Persuade, don’t command	Data-driven proposals
Disagree and commit	Support team decisions	Voice dissent, then execute
Default to transparency	Share context freely	Open docs, RFCs
Extreme ownership	Own outcomes, not just output	Follow through on commitments
Coach, don’t direct	Develop autonomy	Ask questions, give answers
Celebrate others	Credit team, take blame	Public recognition

Practice Scenarios

Scenario Practice Framework

For each scenario:

Identify type: Technical, people, strategic, resource
Apply framework: Use appropriate framework
Think stakeholders: Who’s involved? What do they care about?
Consider trade-offs: What are you optimizing for?
Prepare talking points: 3-4 key points
Practice out loud: Time yourself (3-5 minutes)

Mock Practice

Practice with a partner:

Ask scenario question
Answer in 3-5 minutes
Get feedback on:
- Clarity of framework
- Empathy for stakeholders
- Specificity of actions
- Quantifiable outcomes

Key Takeaways

Framework-based: Use structured approaches, don’t wing it
Stakeholder-first: Understand who’s affected and their perspectives
Data-driven: Bring objective data to decisions
Transparent communication: Share rationale, not just decisions
Influence, not command: Build coalitions, not factions
Own outcomes: Take responsibility for results
Practice scenarios: 10+ scenarios before interviews
Learn from mistakes: How you recovered matters most

Back to Module 9